Skip to content
2000
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1871-5273
  • E-ISSN: 1996-3181

Abstract

Background: Most studies evaluating long-term efficacy after coil embolisation of intracranial aneurysms have not differentiated between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse factors that influence recanalisation in ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 182 (98 ruptured, 84 unruptured) aneurysms, treated with coil embolisation alone that received follow-up with digital substraction angiography (DSA). Results: At 6 months 26%of the aneurysms showed recanalisation. Multivariate variance analysis revealed that different factors influenced recanalisation in ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. In ruptured aneurysms patient age was a determinant, with younger patients recanalising more frequently than older ones (p = 0.016). Also, low initial packing density led to higher recanalisation rates (p = 0.015) than higher packing. In the unruptured aneurysm group these factors were not significant. Here, only a larger aneurysm volume led to higher recanalisation rates (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in ruptured aneurysms, high packing density is a key factor to prevent recanalisation, while in unruptured aneurysms, aneurysm volume is the main predictor for recanalisation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/18715273112119990055
2013-03-01
2025-09-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/18715273112119990055
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): aneurysm; Intracranial; recanalisation; ruptured; unruptured
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test