Skip to content
2000
image of Factors Involved in the Risk of Falls in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-control Study

Abstract

Introduction

The mobility of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is significantly limited due to the involvement of the musculoskeletal system, resulting in falls and a diminished quality of life. This study aimed to assess the risk of falls (utilizing the Downton scale) and its association with spasticity and other variables in pwMS and compare it with a group of healthy participants.

Methods

This descriptive and cross-sectional observational study involved 86 subjects, divided into two groups: cases (n=41) and controls (n=45). All participants completed the Spanish version of the Downton Scale.

Results

There was a significant statistical association (<0.05) in all dimensions of the Downton Scale, except for medications (significant in antihypertensives), showing increased levels of disability and barriers in pwMS. The case group, comprising pwMS, exhibited a significantly higher risk of falls, with a mean score of 2.37 ± 1.76, whereas the healthy subjects scored significantly lower at 0.44 ± 0.62. Additionally, the pwMS displayed notably higher association levels of spasticity compared to the healthy group.

Discussion

The study emphasizes that spasticity significantly increases the risk of falls in pwMS, reinforcing the Downton scale's utility in identifying high-risk individuals. However, limitations such as a non-diverse sample and the absence of comparison with other neurological conditions suggest the need for broader, more inclusive future research.

Conclusion

This study confirms that pwMS face a greater risk of falls compared to their healthy counterparts. Factors such as spasticity, visual impairments, and hearing problems significantly contribute to this increased risk.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
2025-09-17
2025-11-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. JJ Sosnoff J Sung Reducing falls and improving mobility in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2015 15 6 655 666 10.1586/14737175.2015.1046377 25973774
    [Google Scholar]
  2. O’Malley N. Clifford A.M. Comber L. Coote S. Fall definitions, faller classifications and outcomes used in falls research among people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil. 2022 44 6 855 863 10.1080/09638288.2020.1786173 32628889
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rice L. Kalron A. Berkowitz S.H. Backus D. Sosnoff J.J. Fall prevalence in people with multiple sclerosis who use wheelchairs and scooters. Medicine 2017 96 35 7860 10.1097/MD.0000000000007860 28858096
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kierkegaard M. Peterson E. Tuvemo Johnson S. Online self-management fall prevention intervention for people with multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study protocol of a parallel group randomised trial. BMJ Open 2022 12 7 061325 10.1136/bmjopen‑2022‑061325 35803627
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fritz N.E. Eloyan A. Baynes M. Newsome S.D. Calabresi P.A. Zackowski K.M. Distinguishing among multiple sclerosis fallers, near-fallers and non-fallers. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018 19 99 104 10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.019
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Giannì C. Prosperini L. Jonsdottir J. Cattaneo D. A systematic review of factors associated with accidental falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A meta-analytic approach. Clin. Rehabil. 2014 28 7 704 716 10.1177/0269215513517575 24569653
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carling A. Forsberg A. Nilsagård Y. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis: Experiences of 115 fall situations. Clin. Rehabil. 2018 32 4 526 535 10.1177/0269215517730597 28901164
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coote S. Finlayson M. Sosnoff J.J. Level of mobility limitations and falls status in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014 95 5 862 866 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.018 24215991
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thurman D.J. Stevens J.A. Rao J.K. Practice parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review): Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the american academy of neurology. Neurology 2008 70 6 473 479 10.1212/01.wnl.0000299085.18976.20
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sosnoff J.J. Socie M.J. Boes M.K. Mobility, balance and falls in persons with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2011 6 11 28021 10.1371/journal.pone.0028021 22132196
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cattaneo D. Rasova K. Gervasoni E. Dobrovodská G. Montesano A. Jonsdottir J. Falls prevention and balance rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A bi-centre randomised controlled trial. Disabil. Rehabil. 2018 40 5 522 526 10.1080/09638288.2016.1258089 27927030
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sung J. Trace Y. Peterson E.W. Sosnoff J.J. Rice L.A. Falls among full-time wheelchair users with spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis: A comparison of characteristics of fallers and circumstances of falls. Disabil. Rehabil. 2019 41 4 389 395 10.1080/09638288.2017.1393111 29069956
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zwibel H.L. Contribution of impaired mobility and general symptoms to the burden of multiple sclerosis. Adv. Ther. 2009 26 12 1043 1057 10.1007/s12325‑009‑0082‑x 20082242
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Barnes M.P. Kent R.M. Semlyen J.K. McMullen K.M. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2003 17 1 66 70 10.1177/0888439002250449 12645447
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lance J.W. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement. Neurology 1980 30 12 1303 1313 10.1212/WNL.30.12.1303 7192811
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Picelli A. Vallies G. Chemello E. Is spasticity always the same? An observational study comparing the features of spastic equinus foot in patients with chronic stroke and multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017 380 132 136 10.1016/j.jns.2017.07.026 28870553
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Svensson J. Borg S. Nilsson P. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2014 129 1 13 20 10.1111/ane.12139 23683163
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Arroyo R. Vila C. Clissold S. Retrospective observational study of the management of multiple sclerosis patients with resistant spasticity in Spain: The ‘5E’ study. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 2011 11 2 205 213 10.1586/erp.11.6 21476822
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Arpan I. Shah V.V. Mcnames J. Fall prediction based on instrumented measures of gait and turning in daily life in people with multiple sclerosis. Sensors 2022 22 16 5940 10.3390/s22165940
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pless IB Falls in the elderly. Inj Prev 1999 5 1 2 3 10.1136/ip.5.1.2‑b
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mojtaba M. Alinaghizadeh H. Rydwik E. Downton fall risk index during hospitalisation is associated with fall-related injuries after discharge: A longitudinal observational study. J. Physiother. 2018 64 3 172 177 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.05.005 29914804
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Vassallo M. Stockdale R. Sharma J.C. Briggs R. Allen S. A comparative study of the use of four fall risk assessment tools on acute medical wards. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005 53 6 1034 1038 10.1111/j.1532‑5415.2005.53316.x 15935030
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosendahl E. Lundin-Olsson L. Kallin K. Jensen J. Gustafson Y. Nyberg L. Prediction of falls among older people in residential care facilities by the Downton index. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2003 15 2 142 147 10.1007/BF03324492 12889846
    [Google Scholar]
  24. da Costa B.R. Rutjes A.W.S. Mendy A. Freund-Heritage R. Vieira E.R. Can falls risk prediction tools correctly identify fall-prone elderly rehabilitation inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012 7 7 41061 10.1371/journal.pone.0041061 22815914
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Haines T.P. Hill K. Walsh W. Osborne R. Design-related bias in hospital fall risk screening tool predictive accuracy evaluations: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2007 62 6 664 672 10.1093/gerona/62.6.664 17595425
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bueno-García M.J. Roldán-Chicano M.T. Rodríguez-Tello J. Meroño-Rivera M.D. Dávila-Martínez R. Berenguer-García N. Characteristics of the Downton scale in assessing the risk of falls in hospitalized patients. Enferm. Clin. 2017 27 4 227 234 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.02.008 28400165
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nilsson M. Eriksson J. Larsson B. Odén A. Johansson H. Lorentzon M. Fall risk assessment predicts fall‐related injury, hip fracture, and head injury in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2016 64 11 2242 2250 10.1111/jgs.14439 27689675
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Park S.H. Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2018 30 1 1 16 10.1007/s40520‑017‑0749‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Aranda-Gallardo M. Morales-Asencio J.M. Canca-Sánchez J.C. Consequences of errors in questionnaire translation: Spanish version of the Downton Index. Rev. Calid. Asist. 2015 30 4 195 202 10.1016/j.cali.2015.04.003 26068277
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cameron I.D. Dyer S.M. Panagoda C.E. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Libr. 2018 2020 1 CD005465 10.1002/14651858.CD005465.pub4 30191554
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vassallo M. Poynter L. Sharma J.C. Kwan J. Allen S.C. Fall risk-assessment tools compared with clinical judgment: An evaluation in a rehabilitation ward. Age Ageing 2008 37 3 277 281 10.1093/ageing/afn062 18456792
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Butler Forslund E. Jørgensen V. Skavberg Roaldsen K. Hultling C. Wahman K. Franzén E. Predictors of falls in persons with spinal cord injury—a prospective study using the Downton fall risk index and a single question of previous falls. Spinal Cord 2019 57 2 91 99 10.1038/s41393‑018‑0175‑y 29985457
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Aranda-Gallardo M. Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez M. Vazquez-Blanco M.J. Canca-Sanchez J.C. Moya-Suarez A.B. Morales-Asencio J.M. Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: A multicentre longitudinal study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017 17 1 277 10.1186/s12913‑017‑2214‑3 28412939
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Marrie R.A. Cutter G. Tyry T. Vollmer T. A cross-sectional study of bone health in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2009 73 17 1394 1398 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181beece8 19858462
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Coote S. Hogan N. Franklin S. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis who use a walking aid: Prevalence, factors, and effect of strength and balance interventions. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013 94 4 616 621 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.020 23127308
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sosnoff J.J. Finlayson M. McAuley E. Morrison S. Motl R.W. Home-based exercise program and fall-risk reduction in older adults with multiple sclerosis: Phase 1 randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2014 28 3 254 263 10.1177/0269215513501092 23983091
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hoang P. Schoene D. Gandevia S. Smith S. Lord S.R. Effects of a home-based step training programme on balance, stepping, cognition and functional performance in people with multiple sclerosis – a randomized controlled trial. Mult. Scler. 2016 22 1 94 103 10.1177/1352458515579442 25921035
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
Loading
Factors Involved in the Risk of Falls in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-control Study
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273389136250906071330
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keywords: spasticity ; gait instability ; foot ; fall prevention ; Downton scale ; Multiple sclerosis ; sensory impairment ; and risk of falls

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test