Skip to content
2000
  • ISSN: 1568-0053
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5852

Abstract

The optimal therapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) is unknown, and there is little agreement on the exact antifungal management of IA. The previously stagnant landscape of antifungal choices for IA is rapidly changing with newer antifungals and newer targets. While amphotericin B has historically been the preferred therapy, recent studies support voriconazole as primary therapy or caspofungin as salvage therapy. However, even these newer therapies have only elevated clinical response rates to approximately 50%. Recent in vitro studies, animal models, and limited clinical reports suggest that combination antifungal therapy utilizing novel targeting strategies might offer improved outcome. Until very recently, combination antifungal therapy for IA was of little consequence since there were a limited number of possible permutations available. There has been a great deal of new data published exploring the possibilities of combination therapy, but clinicians need to be aware of the potential advantages and disadvantages of combination antifungal therapy for IA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdtid/10.2174/1568005054880145
2005-09-01
2025-09-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cdtid/10.2174/1568005054880145
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): amphotericin b; antifungal; aspergillosis; caspofungin; combination; voriconazole
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test