Skip to content
2000
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1574-8863
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3911

Abstract

Treatment guidelines recommend omega-3 with Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) and Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) content not above 85% in patients with high plasma levels of triglycerides. Since the different up to date formulation of omega-3 available in commerce must be similar to clinical efficacy and safety, herein, we report the case a 52-year-old woman who presented clinical inefficacy using Olevia® omega-3 treatment. Clinical evaluation excluded the presence of intestinal or systemic diseases able to reduce the drug absorption. Switching the therapy from (Olevia®) to an equivalent omega-3 formulation (Esapent®), we documented a decrease in her plasma triglycerides levels. In order to evaluate a possible difference between these formulations we performed a single blind in vitro dissolution test using three pills for each formulation of omega-3 (Olevia®, Esapent® and another one chosen between the several formulations available in commerce: DOC Generic®) that revealed a significant difference (>20%) in the dissolution time of three different omega- 3 commercially available drug formulation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cds/10.2174/1574886311666151106120928
2016-04-01
2025-09-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cds/10.2174/1574886311666151106120928
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): clinical efficacy; clinical inefficacy; dissolution time; Omega-3 formulation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test