Skip to content
2000
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-579X
  • E-ISSN: 2542-5803

Abstract

Background

The most common approach to remove yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) fixed-dental prostheses (FDPs) is by means of diamond burs attached to a high-speed handpiece. This process is time-consuming and destructive. The use of lasers over mechanical instrumentation for removal of FDPs can lead to efficient and predictable restoration retrievability. However, the heat produced might damage the tooth pulp (>42˚C).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum temperature (T) reached during the use of different settings of the erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet Er,Cr:YSGG laser through a YSZ ceramic.

Methods

YSZ slices (1 mm thick) were assigned to 7 groups. For the control group, a diamond bur was used to cut a 1 mm groove into the YSZ slices. For the 6 experimental groups, the laser was operated at a constant combination of 33% water and 66% air during 30 s with two different power settings (W) at three frequencies (PPS), as follows (W/PPS): 2.5/20, 2.5/30, 2.5/45, 4.5/20, 4.5/30, 4.5/45. The T through the YSZ slice was recorded in degrees Celsius by using a digital thermometer with a K thermocouple.

Results

The median T of the control group was 26.5˚C. The use of 4.5 W resulted in the median T (˚C) of 44.2 at 20 PPS, 53.3 at 30 PPS, and 58.9 at 45 PPS, while 2.5 W showed 34.6, 31.6, and 25.0 at 20, 30, and 45 PPS, respectively. Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA showed that within each power setting, the T was similar. The high power and lowest frequency (4.5/20) showed no significant difference from the 2.5 W settings and the control group.

Conclusion

The lower power setting (2.5 W) is a potential method for the use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser to debond YSZ structures. The higher power (4.5 W) with high frequencies (30 and 45 PPS) is unsuitable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200806160149
2020-08-06
2025-11-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DenryI. KellyJ.R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications.Dent. Mater.200824329930710.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007 17659331
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BonaA.D. PechoO.E. AlessandrettiR. Zirconia as a Dental Biomaterial.Materials (Basel)2015884978499110.3390/ma8084978 28793485
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangY. HuangH. GaoL. ZhangF. Investigation of a new 3Y-stabilized zirconia with an improved optical property for applications as a dental ceramic.J. Ceram. Process. Res.201112473476
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SailerI. FehérA. FilserF. GaucklerL.J. LüthyH. HämmerleC.H. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.Int. J. Prosthodont.2007204383388 17695869
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SchleyJ.S. HeussenN. ReichS. FischerJ. HaselhuhnK. WolfartS. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2010118544345010.1111/j.1600‑0722.2010.00767.x 20831577
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SaxC. HämmerleC.H. SailerI. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks.Int. J. Comput. Dent.2011143183202 22141229
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KoenigV. VanheusdenA.J. Le GoffS.O. MainjotA.K. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.J. Dent.201341121164117410.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009 24135294
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SailerI. FehérA. FilserF. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up.Quintessence Int.2006379685693 17017630
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MillarB. An assessment of burs designed to cut zirconia.Open Journal of Stomatology2017727728210.4236/ojst.2017.75021
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SpathA. SmithC. Removal of modern ceramics.Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.2017385326333 28459251
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NakamuraK. KatsudaY. AnkyuS. Cutting efficiency of diamond burs operated with electric high-speed dental handpiece on zirconia.Eur. J. Oral Sci.2015123537538010.1111/eos.12211 26315542
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GuazzatoM. AlbakryM. RingerS.P. SwainM.V. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics.Dent. Mater.200420544945610.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002 15081551
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TongH. TanakaC.B. KaizerM.R. ZhangY. Characterization of three commercial Y-TZP ceramics produced for their high-translucency, high-strength and high-surface area.Ceram. Int.2016421 Pt B1077108510.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.033 26664123
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CavalcantiA.N. FoxtonR.M. WatsonT.F. OliveiraM.T. GianniniM. MarchiG.M. Y-TZP ceramics: key concepts for clinical application.Oper. Dent.200934334435110.2341/08‑79 19544825
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BorbaM. de AraújoM.D. FukushimaK.A. Effect of the microstructure on the lifetime of dental ceramics.Dent. Mater.201127771072110.1016/j.dental.2011.04.003 21536324
    [Google Scholar]
  16. CranskaJ.P. Removing all-ceramic restorations with lasers.Dent. Today2013326101102, 104 23802380
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CranskaJ.P. Laser removal of all-ceramic restorations. solving a difficult clinical challenge.Dent. Today2015343110113 26349274
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AlikhasiM. MonzaviA. EbrahimiH. PirmoradianM. ShamshiriA. GhazanfariR. Debonding time and dental pulp temperature with the Er, Cr: YSGG laser for debonding feldespathic and lithium disilicate veneers.J. Lasers Med. Sci.201910321121410.15171/jlms.2019.34 31749948
    [Google Scholar]
  19. España A, Ascaso TC. CO2 and Er,Cr:YSGG laser applications in debonding ceramic materials: an in vitro study.Open J Den O Med201752530
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HarrelS.K. MolinariJ. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications.J. Am. Dent. Assoc.2004135442943710.14219/jada.archive.2004.0207 15127864
    [Google Scholar]
  21. TorabinejadM. WaltonR.E. Endodontics: Principles and Practice200948
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ben HananU. RegevM. JudesH. Temperature measurements during dental cutting using an internally cooled diamond dental bur.Mat Sci Eng B-Adv2012210551559
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KwonS.J. ParkY.J. JunS.H. Thermal irritation of teeth during dental treatment procedures.Restor. Dent. Endod201338310511210.5395/rde.2013.38.3.105 24010075
    [Google Scholar]
  24. GriggsJ.A. Using fractal geometry to examine failed implants and prostheses.Dent. Mater.201834121748175510.1016/j.dental.2018.09.007 30262134
    [Google Scholar]
  25. GhasemiA. KermanshahH. GhavamM. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment on microshear bond strength of zirconia to resin cement before and after sintering.J. Adhes. Dent.2014164377382 25126623
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZeidanL.C. EstevesC.M. OliveiraJ.A. BrugneraA.Jr CassoniA. RodriguesJ.A. Effect of different power settings of Er,Cr:YSGG laser before or after tribosilicatization on the microshear bond strength between zirconia and two types of cements.Lasers Med. Sci.201833223324010.1007/s10103‑017‑2343‑2 29075997
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SaitoA NamuraY IsokawaK ShimizuN. CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules.Lasers Med. Sci.20183028697410.1007/s10103‑013‑1482‑3 24220847
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200806160149
Loading
/content/journals/cdent/10.2174/2542579X02999200806160149
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Debonding; instrumentation; laser; Laser irradiation; temperature; zirconia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test