Exploring Coding Sequence Length Distributions Across Taxonomic Kingdoms Based on Maximum Information Principle

References

1. BeadleG.W. TatumE.L. Genetic control of biochemical reactions in neurospora.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA1941271149950610.1073/pnas.27.11.499 16588492
   [Google Scholar]
2. WuR. DNA sequence analysis.Annu. Rev. Biochem.197847160763410.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.003135 209729
   [Google Scholar]
3. WangY ZhaiY DingY ZouQ. SBSM-Pro: Support bio-sequence machine for proteins.arXiv2023
   [Google Scholar]
4. CaoC. ShaoM. ZuoC. RAVAR: A curated repository for rare variant–trait associations.Nucleic Acids Res.202452D1D990D99710.1093/nar/gkad876 37831073
   [Google Scholar]
5. SteinL. Genome annotation: From sequence to biology.Nat. Rev. Genet.20012749350310.1038/35080529 11433356
   [Google Scholar]
6. QiaoJ. JinJ. YuH. WeiL. Towards retraining-free RNA modification prediction with incremental learning.Inf. Sci.202466012010510.1016/j.ins.2024.120105
   [Google Scholar]
7. WangL. DingY. TiwariP. A deep multiple kernel learning-based higher-order fuzzy inference system for identifying DNA N4-methylcytosine sites.Inf. Sci.2023630405210.1016/j.ins.2023.01.149
   [Google Scholar]
8. RenL. NingL. YangY. MetaboliteCOVID: A manually curated database of metabolite markers for COVID-19.Comput. Biol. Med.202316710766110.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107661 37925911
   [Google Scholar]
9. GhorbaniM. KarimiH. Bioinformatics approaches for gene finding.Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol.201514
   [Google Scholar]
10. WangR. JiangY. JinJ. DeepBIO: An automated and interpretable deep-learning platform for high-throughput biological sequence prediction, functional annotation and visualization analysis.Nucleic Acids Res.20235173017302910.1093/nar/gkad055 36796796
    [Google Scholar]
11. ZhuH. HaoH. YuL. Identifying disease-related microbes based on multi-scale variational graph autoencoder embedding Wasserstein distance.BMC Biol.202321129410.1186/s12915‑023‑01796‑8 38115088
    [Google Scholar]
12. ZhangY. LiuC. LiuM. Attention is all you need: Utilizing attention in AI-enabled drug discovery.Brief. Bioinform.2023251bbad46710.1093/bib/bbad467 38189543
    [Google Scholar]
13. CobbM. 60 years ago, Francis Crick changed the logic of biology.PLoS Biol.2017159e200324310.1371/journal.pbio.2003243 28922352
    [Google Scholar]
14. ShimizuM. In Origin and evolution of the genetic code, Origin of Life Proceedings of the Third ISSOL Meeting and the Sixth ICOL Meeting.Jerusalem June 22–271980423430
    [Google Scholar]
15. SinghU. WurteleE.S. orfipy: A fast and flexible tool for extracting ORFs.Bioinformatics202137183019302010.1093/bioinformatics/btab090 33576786
    [Google Scholar]
16. ChenS. KrinskyB.H. LongM. New genes as drivers of phenotypic evolution.Nat. Rev. Genet.201314964566010.1038/nrg3521 23949544
    [Google Scholar]
17. JinJ. YuY. WangR. iDNA-ABF: Multi-scale deep biological language learning model for the interpretable prediction of DNA methylations.Genome Biol.202223121910.1186/s13059‑022‑02780‑1 36253864
    [Google Scholar]
18. ZhaoM. HeW. TangJ. ZouQ. GuoF. A hybrid deep learning framework for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomic data.Brief. Bioinform.2022232bbab56810.1093/bib/bbab568 35062026
    [Google Scholar]
19. ZhangY. PanX. ShiT. P450Rdb: A manually curated database of reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes.J. Adv. Res.2023633245 37871773
    [Google Scholar]
20. KearseM.G. WiluszJ.E. Non-AUG translation: A new start for protein synthesis in eukaryotes.Genes Dev.201731171717173110.1101/gad.305250.117 28982758
    [Google Scholar]
21. RenL. XuY. NingL. TCM2COVID: A resource of anti‐COVID-19 traditional Chinese medicine with effects and mechanisms.iMeta202214e4210.1002/imt2.42 36245702
    [Google Scholar]
22. LiuY. ShenX. GongY. LiuY. SongB. ZengX. Sequence Alignment/Map format: A comprehensive review of approaches and applications.Brief. Bioinform.2023245bbad32010.1093/bib/bbad320 37668049
    [Google Scholar]
23. TekaiaF. YeramianE. DujonB. Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: A global picture with correspondence analysis.Gene20022971-2516010.1016/S0378‑1119(02)00871‑5 12384285
    [Google Scholar]
24. MorariuV.V. Distribution and Correlation of the coding sequence lengths in bacterial genomes.J. Chem.200859111201120410.37358/RC.08.11.2000
    [Google Scholar]
25. ZhangJ. Protein-length distributions for the three domains of life.Trends Genet.200016310710910.1016/S0168‑9525(99)01922‑8 10689349
    [Google Scholar]
26. FengL. LiH. The distribution model of open reading frame length in different genomes and the genome evolution.ACTA BIOPHYSICA SINICA2004205375381
    [Google Scholar]
27. BoltzmannL. Lectures on gas theory.Univ of California Press202310.2307/jj.8501520
    [Google Scholar]
28. HakenH. Information and self-organization a macroscopic approach to complex systems.Springer Berlin Heidelberg1988
    [Google Scholar]
29. LuoL. BaiG. The maximum information principle and the evolution of nucleotide sequences.J. Theor. Biol.1995174213113610.1006/jtbi.1995.0086 7643609
    [Google Scholar]
30. LynchM. ConeryJ.S. The origins of genome complexity.Science200330256491401140410.1126/science.1089370 14631042
    [Google Scholar]
31. LiH.L. PangY.H. LiuB. BioSeq-BLM: A platform for analyzing DNA, RNA and protein sequences based on biological language models.Nucleic Acids Res.20214922e12910.1093/nar/gkab829 34581805
    [Google Scholar]
32. LiuB. GaoX. ZhangH. BioSeq-Analysis2.0: An updated platform for analyzing DNA, RNA and protein sequences at sequence level and residue level based on machine learning approaches.Nucleic Acids Res.20194720e12710.1093/nar/gkz740 31504851
    [Google Scholar]
33. ChenL. YuL. GaoL. Potent antibiotic design via guided search from antibacterial activity evaluations.Bioinformatics2023392btad05910.1093/bioinformatics/btad059 36707990
    [Google Scholar]
34. KimuraM. The neutral theory of molecular evolution.Sci Am1979241598126102, 108 passim10.1038/scientificamerican1179‑98504979
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZhangR. A rebuttal to the comments on the genome order index and the Z-curve.Biol. Direct2011611010.1186/1745‑6150‑6‑10 21324187
    [Google Scholar]
36. BrocchieriL. KarlinS. Protein length in eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes.Nucleic Acids Res.200533103390340010.1093/nar/gki615 15951512
    [Google Scholar]
37. TiessenA. Pérez-RodríguezP. Delaye-ArredondoL.J. Mathematical modeling and comparison of protein size distribution in different plant, animal, fungal and microbial species reveals a negative correlation between protein size and protein number, thus providing insight into the evolution of proteomes.BMC Res. Notes2012518510.1186/1756‑0500‑5‑85 22296664
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ramírez-SánchezO. Pérez-RodríguezP. DelayeL. TiessenA. Plant proteins are smaller because they are encoded by fewer exons than animal proteins.Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics201614635737010.1016/j.gpb.2016.06.003 27998811
    [Google Scholar]
39. NeversY. GloverN.M. DessimozC. LecompteO. Protein length distribution is remarkably uniform across the tree of life.Genome Biol.202324113510.1186/s13059‑023‑02973‑2 37291671
    [Google Scholar]
40. KooninE.V. WolfY.I. Genomics of bacteria and archaea: The emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world.Nucleic Acids Res.200836216688671910.1093/nar/gkn668 18948295
    [Google Scholar]
41. LongX. XueH. WongJ.T.F. Descent of bacteria and eukarya from an archaeal root of life.Evol. Bioinform. Online202016117693432090826710.1177/1176934320908267 32636606
    [Google Scholar]
42. BelshawR. PybusO.G. RambautA. The evolution of genome compression and genomic novelty in RNA viruses.Genome Res.200717101496150410.1101/gr.6305707 17785537
    [Google Scholar]
43. JayaramanB. SmithA.M. FernandesJ.D. FrankelA.D. Oligomeric viral proteins: Small in size, large in presence.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.201651537939410.1080/10409238.2016.1215406 27685368
    [Google Scholar]