CNRBind: Small Molecule-RNA Binding Sites Recognition via Site Significant from Nucleotide and Complex Network Information

References

1. ChenX. RechaviO. Plant and animal small RNA communications between cells and organisms.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.202223318520310.1038/s41580‑021‑00425‑y 34707241
   [Google Scholar]
2. YuY. ZhangB. JiP. Changes to gut amino acid transporters and microbiome associated with increased E/I ratio in Chd8+/− mouse model of ASD-like behavior.Nat. Commun.2022131115110.1038/s41467‑022‑28746‑2 35241668
   [Google Scholar]
3. Childs-DisneyJ.L. YangX. GibautQ.M.R. TongY. BateyR.T. DisneyM.D. Targeting RNA structures with small molecules.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.2022211073676210.1038/s41573‑022‑00521‑4 35941229
   [Google Scholar]
4. ZengP. LiJ. MaW. CuiQ. Rsite: A computational method to identify the functional sites of noncoding RNAs.Sci. Rep.201551917910.1038/srep09179 25776805
   [Google Scholar]
5. ZengP. CuiQ. Rsite2: An efficient computational method to predict the functional sites of noncoding RNAs.Sci. Rep.2016611901610.1038/srep19016 26751501
   [Google Scholar]
6. WangK. JianY. WangH. ZengC. ZhaoY. RBind: Computational network method to predict RNA binding sites.Bioinformatics201834183131313610.1093/bioinformatics/bty345 29718097
   [Google Scholar]
7. ZhangL. HuangZ. KongL. CSBPI_Site: Multi-information sources of features to RNA binding sites prediction.Curr. Bioinform.202116569169910.2174/1574893615666210108093950
   [Google Scholar]
8. SuH. PengZ. YangJ. Recognition of small molecule–RNA binding sites using RNA sequence and structure.Bioinformatics2021371364210.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1092 33416863
   [Google Scholar]
9. WangK. ZhouR. WuY. LiM. RLBind: A deep learning method to predict RNA–ligand binding sites.Brief. Bioinform.2023241bbac48610.1093/bib/bbac486 36398911
   [Google Scholar]
10. ChenP. HuangJ.Z. GaoX. LigandRFs: Random forest ensemble to identify ligand-binding residues from sequence information alone.BMC Bioinformatics201415S15Suppl. 15S410.1186/1471‑2105‑15‑S15‑S4 25474163
    [Google Scholar]
11. GongS. ZhangC. ZhangY. RNA-align: Quick and accurate alignment of RNA 3D structures based on size-independent TM-scoreRNA.Bioinformatics201935214459446110.1093/bioinformatics/btz282 31161212
    [Google Scholar]
12. LiW. GodzikA. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.Bioinformatics200622131658165910.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 16731699
    [Google Scholar]
13. KongL. ZhangL. LiangY. XiaoK. i4mC-CPXG: A computational model for identifying DNA N4- methylcytosine sites in rosaceae genome using novel encoding strategy.Curr. Bioinform.2023181122010.2174/1574893618666221124095411
    [Google Scholar]
14. YuN. LiZ. YuZ. Survey on encoding schemes for genomic data representation and feature learning—from signal processing to machine learning.Big Data Mining Anal20181319121010.26599/BDMA.2018.9020018
    [Google Scholar]
15. NairA.S. SreenadhanS.P. A coding measure scheme employing electron-ion interaction pseudopotential (EIIP).Bioinformation200616197202 17597888
    [Google Scholar]
16. SunS. WuQ. PengZ. YangJ. Enhanced prediction of RNA solvent accessibility with long short-term memory neural networks and improved sequence profiles.Bioinformatics201935101686169110.1093/bioinformatics/bty876 30321300
    [Google Scholar]
17. ChenW. FengP. TangH. DingH. LinH. Identifying 2′-O-methylationation sites by integrating nucleotide chemical properties and nucleotide compositions.Genomics2016107625525810.1016/j.ygeno.2016.05.003 27191866
    [Google Scholar]
18. BiauG. ScornetE. A random forest guided tour.Test201625219722710.1007/s11749‑016‑0481‑7
    [Google Scholar]
19. ZhangY.F. WangY.H. GuZ.F. Bitter-RF: A random forest machine model for recognizing bitter peptides.Front. Med. (Lausanne)2023101105292310.3389/fmed.2023.1052923 36778738
    [Google Scholar]
20. BeltránJ.F. BelénL.H. FariasJ.G. VirusHound-I: Prediction of viral proteins involved in the evasion of host adaptive immune response using the random forest algorithm and generative adversarial network for data augmentation.Brief. Bioinform.2023251bbad43410.1093/bib/bbad434 38033292
    [Google Scholar]
21. CuzickJ. A wilcoxon-type test for trend.Stat. Med.198541879010.1002/sim.4780040112 3992076
    [Google Scholar]
22. MengQ. PengZ. YangJ. CoABind: A novel algorithm for Coenzyme A (CoA)- and CoA derivatives-binding residues prediction.Bioinformatics201834152598260410.1093/bioinformatics/bty162 29547921
    [Google Scholar]
23. TanZ. ZhangW. ShiY. WangF. RNA folding: Structure prediction, folding kinetics and ion electrostatics.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.201582714318310.1007/978‑94‑017‑9245‑5_11 25387965
    [Google Scholar]
24. WangJ. XiaoY. Types and concentrations of metal ions affect local structure and dynamics of RNA.Phys. Rev. E201694404040110.1103/PhysRevE.94.040401 27841650
    [Google Scholar]
25. McManusC.J. GraveleyB.R. RNA structure and the mechanisms of alternative splicing.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.201121437337910.1016/j.gde.2011.04.001 21530232
    [Google Scholar]
26. PopendaM. SzachniukM. BlazewiczM. RNA FRABASE 2.0: An advanced web-accessible database with the capacity to search the three-dimensional fragments within RNA structures.BMC Bioinformatics201011123110.1186/1471‑2105‑11‑231 20459631
    [Google Scholar]
27. PopendaM. SzachniukM. AntczakM. Automated 3D structure composition for large RNAs.Nucleic Acids Res.20124014e11210.1093/nar/gks339 22539264
    [Google Scholar]
28. MaiorovV.N. CrippenG.M. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins.J. Mol. Biol.1994235262563410.1006/jmbi.1994.1017 8289285
    [Google Scholar]
29. TanKP VaradarajanR MadhusudhanMS DEPTH: A web server to compute depth and predict small-molecule binding cavities in proteins.Nucleic Acids Res201139(Web Server issue)(Suppl. 2): W242-8.10.1093/nar/gkr356 21576233
    [Google Scholar]