Skip to content
2000
image of Prediction Factors for Quality Risks in the Pharmaceutical Development of Tablets Bisoprolol Fumarate with Indapamide

Abstract

Background

An important characteristic of the quality-by-design approach is defining risk, which is a combination of the probability of harm and its severity. During risk assessment, it is essential to determine how the formulation, properties of active ingredients and excipients, and process parameters can potentially affect critical quality attributes or critical process parameters.

Objective

to develop an algorithm and a mathematical model for predicting quality risks in the pharmaceutical development of bisoprolol fumarate tablets with indapamide.

Methods

The software programs “Microsoft Excel 2016” and “Statistica 10.0” (StatSoft, Inc.) were used to predict potential risks and to build a regression model of quality-related risks for bisoprolol fumarate tablets with indapamide.

Results

A mathematical model for predicting the tablet quality risk has been developed, incorporating significant predictors: Carr's index for powder mixtures (Х1), evaluation of the pressing process (Х2), uniformity of tablet weight (Х3), tablets hardness testing (Х4), disintegration time (Х6). Four levels of quality risk are defined: low risk [0.8-1.0], moderate risk [0.6-0.8], high risk [0.4-0.6], and critical risk [0-0.4]. The calculated coefficient of determination of the forecasting model (R2=0.8168) testifies to its high quality.

Conclusion

The developed algorithm and mathematical model for predicting tablet quality risks are highly informative and qualitative. The proposed approach represents an innovative and promising tool for assessing and predicting risks associated with the quality of medicinal products, particularly during the early stages of pharmaceutical development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cad/10.2174/0115734099355630250226063047
2025-03-13
2025-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Deepak Kumar D. Ancheria R. Shrivastava S. Soni S.L. Sharma M. Review on pharmaceutical quality by design (QbD). Asian J Pharm Res Dev. 2019 7 2 78 82 10.22270/ajprd.v7i2.460
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pavliuk B. Chubka M. Hroshovyi T. Demchuk M. Stechyshyn I. The development of biodegradable hemostatic and absorbable sponges containing chlorhexidine digluconate and their in vitro characterization—A QbD approach. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022 12 2 56 65 10.7324/JAPS.2021.120206
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lourenço F.R. Francisco F.L. Ferreira M.R.S. Andreoli T.D.J. Löbenberg R. Bou-Chacra N. Design space approach for preservative system optimization of an anti-aging eye fluid emulsion. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015 18 3 551 561 10.18433/J3J600 26517141
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hroshovyi T. Martseniuk V. Kucherenko L. Vronska L. Hureeva S. Mathematical planning of experiments in conducting scientific research in pharmacy. Ternopil Ukrmedknyhas 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Demchuk M. Grochovuy T. Chubka M. Stechyshyn I. Greco-Latin square design for selection of excipients in the development of metformin orodispersible tablets. Asian J. Pharm. 2018 12 3 211 220
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ukrainian Scientific Pharmacopoeial Center for the Quality of Medical Supplies State Enterprise. Kharkiv 2018 1128
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shailendra C. Hemant K. Sanjay J. Lalit Singh C. Preparation and optimization of directly compressible excipient using design of experiment approach. J. Chem. Health Risks 2024 14 2 1391 1399
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nykytyuk S. Sverstiuk A.S. Klymnyuk S.I. Pyvovarchuk D.S. Palaniza Y.B. Approach to prediction and receiver operating characteristic analysis of a regression model for assessing the severity of the course Lyme borreliosis in children. Reumatologia 2023 61 5 345 352 10.5114/reum/173115 37970115
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Herasymiuk M. Sverstiuk A. Kit I. Multifactor regression model for prediction of chronic rhinosinusitis recurrence. Wiad. Lek. 2023 76 5 pt 1 928 935 10.36740/WLek202305106
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tasnim S. Tipu M.F.K. Rana M.S. Rahim M.A. Haque M. Amran M.S. Chowdhury A.A. Chowdhury J.A. Modification of bulk density, flow property and crystallinity of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from waste cotton. Materials 2023 16 16 5664 10.3390/ma16165664 37629955
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Amidon G.E. Meyer P.J. Mudie D. Particle, Powder, and Compact Characterization. In: Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms Pharmaceutical Theory and Practice, 2nd ed; Yihong, Q.; Geoff, G.Z.Z.; Rao, V.M.; Yisheng, C.; Lawrence, Y., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 271-293. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑802447‑8.00010‑8
  12. Pawar P. Joo H. Callegari G. Drazer G. Cuitino A.M. Muzzio F.J. The effect of mechanical strain on properties of lubricated tablets compacted at different pressures. Powder Technol. 2016 301 657 664 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.05.058
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Snick B. Holman J. Cunningham C. Kumar A. Vercruysse J. De Beer T. Remon J.P. Vervaet C. Continuous direct compression as manufacturing platform for sustained release tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 2017 519 1-2 390 407 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.010
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tryhubchak O.V. Studies of optimal conditions for the preparation of acetylsalicylic acid tablets with atorvastatin. Likes of Ukraine. 2018 2 35 7 10
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitra B. Chang J. Wu S.J. Wolfe C.N. Ternik R.L. Gunter T.Z. Victor M.C. Feasibility of mini-tablets as a flexible drug delivery tool. Int. J. Pharm. 2017 525 1 149 159 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.037 28432019
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Khatoon S. Singh A. Kumar P. Hashmi M. Review article on inprocess problems and evaluation tests of tablets manufacturing. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023 2 3 198 201 10.55544/jrasb.2.3.26
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mekasha Y.T. Chali B.U. Feissa A.B. Godena G.H. Hassen H.K. Wega S.S. Quality evaluation of the Azithromycin tablets commonly marketed in Adama, and Modjo towns, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. PLoS One 2023 18 3 e0282156 10.1371/journal.pone.0282156 36862656
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cad/10.2174/0115734099355630250226063047
Loading
/content/journals/cad/10.2174/0115734099355630250226063047
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test