Skip to content
2000
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2211-3525
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3533

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common surgery related complication in healthcare worldwide. Infections due to carbapenem resistant are increasing dramatically with significant impact on surgical patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to detect and efflux pump genes in isolated from infected surgical wounds.

Methods

A study including 291 patients was conducted at Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital (BMCTH), Biratnagar, from October 2021 to October 2022. Specimens were collected from the patients with SSIs under aseptic conditions and sent to the microbiology laboratory. was identified by VITEK 2. The presence of carbapenemase was phenotypically screened by the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM). and efflux pump genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results and Discussion

A total of 134 (46%) specimens were culture positive, out of which 24 (30%) were identified as with 11 (45.8%) isolates resistant to carbapenem. Tigecycline and colistin were the most effective drugs against . Among these isolates, seven were found to be mCIM positive. was absent in all mCIM-positive isolates, however, efflux pump genes ( and ) were detected in all of the carbapenem-resistant isolates.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant could be attributed to the efflux pump genes. This finding suggests that the AcrAB efflux pump may be the major virulence factor that can contribute to multidrug-resistant strains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525347585250414063103
2025-05-15
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berríos-TorresS.I. UmscheidC.A. BratzlerD.W. LeasB. StoneE.C. KelzR.R. ReinkeC.E. MorganS. SolomkinJ.S. MazuskiJ.E. DellingerE.P. ItaniK.M.F. BerbariE.F. SegretiJ. ParviziJ. BlanchardJ. AllenG. KluytmansJ.A.J.W. DonlanR. SchecterW.P. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection.JAMA Surg.2017152878479110.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904 28467526
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MehtarS. WanyoroA. OgunsolaF. AmehE.A. NthumbaP. KilpatrickC. RevathiG. AntoniadouA. GiamarelouH. ApisarnthanarakA. RamatowskiJ.W. RosenthalV.D. StorrJ. OsmanT.S. SolomkinJ.S. Implementation of surgical site infection surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A position statement for the International Society for Infectious Diseases.Int. J. Infect. Dis.202010012313110.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.021 32712427
    [Google Scholar]
  3. OrstedH. L. KeastD. H. Forest-LalandeL. KuhnkeJ. L. O’Sullivan-DrombolisD. JinS. EvansR. MackayE. DannL. J. Best practice recommendations for the prevention and management of wounds.Wound Care Can2017142 https://www.woundscanada.ca/news/53-healthcare-professional/resource-library/best-practice-recommendations?start=10
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SmythE.T.M. EmmersonA.M. Surgical site infection surveillance.J. Hosp. Infect.200045317318410.1053/jhin.2000.0736 10896795
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AllegranziB. NejadS.B. CombescureC. GraafmansW. AttarH. DonaldsonL. PittetD. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet2011377976122824110.1016/S0140‑6736(10)61458‑4 21146207
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChauveauxD. Preventing surgical-site infections: Measures other than antibiotics.Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res.2015101Suppl. 1S77S8310.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.028 25623269
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NegiV. PalS. JuyalD. SharmaM.K. SharmaN. Bacteriological profile of surgical site infections and their antibiogram: A study from resource constrained rural setting of Uttarakhand State, India.J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2015910DC17DC2010.7860/JCDR/2015/15342.6698 26557520
    [Google Scholar]
  8. OwensC.D. StoesselK. Surgical site infections: Epidemiology, microbiology and prevention.J. Hosp. Infect.200870Suppl. 231010.1016/S0195‑6701(08)60017‑1 19022115
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SuchitraJ.B. LakshmideviN. Surgical site infections: Assessing risk factors, outcomes and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns.Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.200934175179
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MukagendanezaM.J. MunyanezaE. MuhawenayoE. NyiraseburaD. AbahujeE. NyirigiraJ. HarelimanaJ.D.D. MuvunyiT.Z. MasaisaF. ByiringiroJ.C. HategekimanaT. MuvunyiC.M. Incidence, root causes, and outcomes of surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital in Rwanda: A prospective observational cohort study.Patient Saf. Surg.20191311010.1186/s13037‑019‑0190‑8 30820247
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BhattacharyaS. PalK. JainS. ChatterjeeS.S. KonarJ. Surgical site infection by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus– On decline?J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2016109DC32DC3610.7860/JCDR/2016/21664.8587 27790436
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GashawM. BerhaneM. BekeleS. KibruG. TeshagerL. YilmaY. AhmedY. FentahunN. AssefaH. WieserA. GudinaE.K. AliS. Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: A cross sectional study.Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control20187113810.1186/s13756‑018‑0431‑0 30479751
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MeletisG. Carbapenem resistance: Overview of the problem and future perspectives.Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis.201631152110.1177/2049936115621709 26862399
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guidelines for the Prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in health care facilities.GenevaWorld Health Organization2017
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PitoutJ.D.D. NordmannP. PoirelL. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, a key pathogen set for global nosocomial dominance.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.201559105873588410.1128/AAC.01019‑15 26169401
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WangP. ChenS. GuoY. XiongZ. HuF. ZhuD. ZhangY. Occurrence of false positive results for the detection of carbapenemases in carbapenemase-negative Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.PLoS One2011610e2635610.1371/journal.pone.0026356 22031829
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RaghunathanA. SamuelL. TibbettsR.J. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase genes in microbiological samples in comparison with the modified Hodge test.Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2011135456657110.1309/AJCPPVNUI3O9JHJW 21411778
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ArnoldR.S. ThomK.A. SharmaS. PhillipsM. Kristie JohnsonJ. MorganD.J. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria.South. Med. J.20111041404510.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181fd7d5a 21119555
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PatelG. BonomoR.A. Stormy waters ahead: Global emergence of carbapenemases.Front. Microbiol.201344810.3389/fmicb.2013.00048 23504089
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PérezA. PozaM. FernándezA. del Carmen FernándezM. MalloS. MerinoM. Rumbo-FealS. CabralM.P. BouG. Involvement of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in the resistance, fitness, and virulence of Enterobacter cloacae.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.20125642084209010.1128/AAC.05509‑11 22290971
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DolejskaM. VillaL. PoirelL. NordmannP. CarattoliA. Complete sequencing of an IncHI1 plasmid encoding the carbapenemase NDM-1, the ArmA 16S RNA methylase and a resistance-nodulation-cell division/multidrug efflux pump.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.2013681343910.1093/jac/dks357 22969080
    [Google Scholar]
  22. VITEK 2 Systems Product Information; bioMérieux, Inc.: Durham, NC,2010Available online: https://www.biomerieux.com/us/en/our-offer/clinical-products/vitek-2.html (accessed Aug 13, 2025).
  23. PyakurelS. AnsariM. KattelS. RaiG. ShresthaP. RaiK.R. SahA.K. RaiS.K. Prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.Trop. Med. Health20214917810.1186/s41182‑021‑00368‑2 34565485
    [Google Scholar]
  24. van der ZwaluwK. de HaanA. PluisterG.N. BootsmaH.J. de NeelingA.J. SchoulsL.M. The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in Gram-negative rods.PLoS One2015103e012369010.1371/journal.pone.0123690 25798828
    [Google Scholar]
  25. OmarB.A. AtifH.A. MogahidM.E. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of bacterial genomic DNA.Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.20148659860210.5897/AJMR2013.6459
    [Google Scholar]
  26. PoirelL. WalshT.R. CuvillierV. NordmannP. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes.Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.201170111912310.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002 21398074
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RazaviS. MirnejadR. BabapourE. Involvement of AcrAB and OqxAB efflux pumps in antimicrobial resistance of clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.J Appl Biotechnol Rep202074251257
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SattarF. SattarZ. ZamanM. AkbarS. Frequency of post-operative surgical site infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Abbottabad, Pakistan.Cureus2019113e424310.7759/cureus.4243 31131166
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Adams-HowellP. BhabraM. EnrightM. KiernanM. KolvekarS. TruemanP. Under the Knife: Taking a Zero Tolerance Approach to Preventable Surgical Site Infections in UK Hospitals; CareFusion: San Diego, CA,2011Available from: http://www.carefusion.co.uk/documents/international/continuing-education/infection-prevention/IP_Under-the-knife_CE_EN.pdf
  30. MarchiM. PanA. GagliottiC. MorsilloF. ParentiM. ResiD. MoroM.L. The Italian national surgical site infection surveillance programme and its positive impact, 2009 to 2011.Euro Surveill.201419212081510.2807/1560‑7917.ES2014.19.21.20815 24906378
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LeblebiciogluH. ErbenN. RosenthalV.D. SenerA. UzunC. SenolG. ErsozG. DemirdalT. DuyguF. WillkeA. SirmatelF. OztoprakN. KoksalI. OnculO. GurbuzY. GüçlüE. TurgutH. YalcinA.N. OzdemirD. KendirliT. AslanT. EsenS. UlgerF. DilekA. YilmazH. SunbulM. OzgunesI. UsluerG. OtkunM. KayaA. KuyucuN. KayaZ. MericM. AzakE. YýlmazG. KayaS. UlusoyH. HaznedarogluT. GorenekL. AcarA. TutuncuE. KarabayO. KayaG. SacarS. SungurtekinH. UğurcanD. TurhanO. KayaS. GumusE. DursunO. GeyikM.F. ŞahinA. ErdoganS. InceE. KarbuzA. ÇiftçiE. TaşyaparN. GüneşM. Surgical site infection rates in 16 cities in Turkey: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC).Am. J. Infect. Control2015431485210.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.017 25564124
    [Google Scholar]
  32. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery: Safe Surgery Saves Lives; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland,2008Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241598552
  33. KefaleB. TegegneG.T. DeguA. MollaM. KefaleY. Surgical site infections and prophylaxis antibiotic use in the surgical ward of Public Hospital in Western Ethiopia: A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study.Infect. Drug Resist.2020133627363510.2147/IDR.S281097 33116682
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MishaG. ChelkebaL. MelakuT. Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolates among patients diagnosed with surgical site infection at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob.20212013310.1186/s12941‑021‑00440‑z 33971896
    [Google Scholar]
  35. NirwatiH. SinanjungK. FahrunissaF. WijayaF. NapitupuluS. HatiV.P. HakimM.S. MelialaA. AmanA.T. NuryastutiT. Biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital, Klaten, Indonesia.BMC Proc.201913S11Suppl. 112010.1186/s12919‑019‑0176‑7 31890013
    [Google Scholar]
  36. QuansahE. Amoah BarnieP. Omane AcheampongD. Obiri-YeboahD. Odarkor MillsR. AsmahE. CudjoeO. DadzieI. Geographical distribution of β-Lactam resistance among Klebsiella spp. from selected health facilities in Ghana.Trop. Med. Infect. Dis.20194311710.3390/tropicalmed4030117 31484298
    [Google Scholar]
  37. RemyaP. ShanthiM. SekarU. Prevalence of blaKPC and its occurrence with other beta-lactamases in Klebsiella pneumoniae.J. Lab. Physicians201810438739110.4103/JLP.JLP_29_18 30498308
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ShresthaB. SahA.K. ThakuriL.S. PradhanR.N. NathD.K. MainaliS. AryalS. Detection of KPC and oxa-48 gene in clinical isolates of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Research Square201910.21203/rs.2.15835/v1
    [Google Scholar]
  39. TammaP.D. SimnerP.J. Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms from clinical isolates.J. Clin. Microbiol.20185611e01140e1810.1128/JCM.01140‑18 30158194
    [Google Scholar]
  40. LoganL.K. WeinsteinR.A. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The impact and evolution of a global menace.J. Infect. Dis.2017215Suppl. 1S28S3610.1093/infdis/jiw282 28375512
    [Google Scholar]
  41. AdlerM. AnjumM. AnderssonD.I. SandegrenL. Combinations of mutations in envZ, ftsI, mrdA, acrB and acrR can cause high-level carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.20167151188119810.1093/jac/dkv475 26869688
    [Google Scholar]
  42. MeletisG. ExindariM. VavatsiN. SofianouD. DizaE. Mechanisms responsible for the emergence of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Hippokratia2012164303307 23935307
    [Google Scholar]
  43. SekarP. MamtoraD. BhalekarP. KrishnanP. AcrAB-TolC efflux pump mediated resistance to carbapenems among clinical isolates of enterobacteriaceae.J. Pure Appl. Microbiol.20221631982198910.22207/JPAM.16.3.48
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525347585250414063103
Loading
/content/journals/aia/10.2174/0122113525347585250414063103
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test